Phenomenology of cognitive styles in management: the correlations between cognitive styles and strategic types

  • O. Bogataia G.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of the NAPS of Ukraine
Keywords: cognitive style; typology; administrative activity; organization; manager.


The article shows that different behavioral profiles of chief executives are related to different types of prevailing strategies. Following hypothesis is analyzed in the article: individual methods of how information is collected, evaluated, and processed, intrinsic to a manager, could be also reflected in his/her strategic decisions. It is proved that expansion strategy, being applied in saturated market, demands the «conqueror» type of manager that can be described as creatively oriented to all new, with broad and rational thinking. A strong leader with systemic approach, common sense and clear reasoning is the managerial type that fits well with strategy of growth. Prudent and formal type of manager, whose behavior is characterized by reactivity and leaning on prescribed procedures, will possess probably the most adequate set of characteristics for realization of slipping strategy (when a company has negative internal potential). Strategy of reduction, that presumes negative growth, requires diplomatic type of manager, whose style of thinking authors describe as wide and multi-aspect. The aim of our article is theoretical development of idea of connection between cognitive style of a manager and his/her strategic decisions. Many similarities were educed between ideal types of organizations for managers with different cognitive styles and typology of Miles and Snow. Previous research that studied cognitive styles were often concentrated on the process of decision-making instead of strategic decisions; such demographical parameters, as age, socio-economic origin or education level were used for explanation of strategic choices. However, based on these characteristics it has been possible to explain different strategic choices done by managers based on identical information. Thus, cognitive style of a manager is the key link able to explain differences in strategic choices. It is underlined that differences in strategic decisions take place foremost not from differences in available information, but rather from different interpretations of such information, that managers make in accordance with their own cognitive styles.


Beatty, R.P. and Zajac, E.J. (1987). CEO change and firm performance in large corporations: succession effects and manager effects. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 8. No. 4, pp. 305-17.
Chanin, M.N. and Schneer, J.A. (1984). A study of the relationship between Jungian personality dimensions and conflict-handling behavior. Human Relations, Vol. 37. No. 10, pp. 863-79.
Haley, U.C.V. and Stumpf, S.A. (1989). Cognitive trails in strategic decision making: linking theories of personalities and cognitions. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 26. No. 5, pp. 477-97.
Hambrick, D.C. and Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9. No. 2, pp. 193-206.
Henderson, J.C. and Nutt , P.C. (1980). The Influ-ence of decision style on decision-making behavior. Management Science, Vol. 26. No. 4, pp. 371-86.
Herbert, T.T. and Deresky, H. (1987). Should general managers match their business strategies? Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 16. No. 3, pp. 40-51.
Hurst, D.K., Rush, J.C. and White, R.E. (1989). Top management teams and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 10, special issue, Summer, pp. 87-105.
Kilmann, R.H. and Herden, R.P. (1976). Towards a systematic methodology for evaluating the impact of interventions on organizational effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 1. No. 3, pp. 87-98.
Macintosh, N.B. (1985). The Social Software of Accounting and Information Systems. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Mason, R.O. and Mitroff, I.I. (1973). A program for research on management information sys-tems. Management Science, Vol. 19. No. 5, pp. 475-87.
Miles, R.E. and Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational Strategy Structure, and Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Miller, D., Kets De Vries, M.F.R. and Toulouse, J.-M. (1982). Top executive locus of control and its relationship to strategy-making, structure, and environment. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 25. No. 2, pp. 237-53.
Mitroff, I.I. and Kilmann, R.H. (1975). Stories managers tell: a new tool for organizational problem solving. Management Review, July, pp. 18-28.
Myers, I.B. and McCaulley, M.H. (1990). Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto, CA.
Nutt, P.C. (1986).Decision style and strategic decisions of top executives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 30, pp. 39-62.
Rajagopalan, N. and Datta, D.K. (1996). CEO characteristics: does industry matter?. Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 197-215.
Rosenak, C.M. and Shontz, F.C. (1988). Jungian Q-sorts: demonstrating construct validity for psychological type and the MBTI. Journal of Psychological Type, Vol. 15, pp. 33-45.
Ryckman, R.M. (1989). Theories of Personality. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, a division of Wadsworth, Inc.
Stumpf, S.A. and Dunbar, R.L.M. (1991).The effects of personality type on choices made in strategic decision situations. Decision Sciences , Vol. 22, pp. 1047-69.
Wissema, J.G., van der Pol H.W. and Messer, H.M. (1980). Strategic management archetypes. Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 1, pp. 37-47.
How to Cite
Bogataia, O. (2021). Phenomenology of cognitive styles in management: the correlations between cognitive styles and strategic types. American Journal of Fundamental, Applied & Experimental Research, 22(3), 77-83. Retrieved from